You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive Results for Best-Fit Models Within Each Model Category

From: Contrasting cumulative risk and multiple individual risk models of the relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and adult health outcomes

  Depression Cardiac Disease Obesity
Model Type R2 AIC c-stat R2 AIC c-stat R2 AIC c-stat
Multiple Individual risk .197 47,899 .745 .200 27,970 .798 .042 67,013 .609
Best-fit 11 items, ‘once’ 11 items, ‘more than once’ 11 items, ‘once’ (by AIC)
Cumulative Risk – Categorical .178 48,638 .734 .200 27,974 .797 .041 67,035 .608
Best-fit 11 items, ‘once’ + quadratic 11 items, ‘more than once’ 11 items, ‘once’ (by AIC)
Cumulative Risk –Continuous .176 48,645 .732 .199 27,979 .796 .041 67,037 .608
Best-fit 9 items, ‘once’ + quadratic 11 items, ‘more than once’ 11 items, ‘once’ (by AIC)
  1. R2 is Nagelkerke. (by AIC) indicates that the model comparisons within that model category were not significantly different from each other, and the best fit model was chosen as that with the smaller AIC. For the depression outcome only, the CR continuous model included a quadratic term