Table 3 Participant feedback on the course
| Questionnaire items and responses |
n (%) (N = 14) |
|---|---|
| Course improved professional knowledge of subject | |
| Yes | 14 (100%) |
| No | 0 (0%) |
| Likelihood of making changes in clinical trial recruitment and retention practices | |
| Very likely | 10 (71.4%) |
| Somewhat likely | 4 (28.6%) |
| Somewhat unlikely | 0 (0%) |
| Not at all likely | 0 (0%) |
| Course materials and presentations were free of bias | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) |
| Disagree | 0 (0%) |
| Neutral | 0 (0%) |
| Agree | 6 (42.9%) |
| Strongly agree | 8 (57.1%) |
| Learning materials were of high quality | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) |
| Disagree | 0 (0%) |
| Neutral | 0 (0%) |
| Agree | 7 (50.0%) |
| Strongly agree | 7 (50.0%) |
| Format was effective in conveying content | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) |
| Disagree | 0 (0%) |
| Neutral | 0 (0%) |
| Agree | 6 (42.9%) |
| Strongly agree | 8 (57.1%) |
| Interactive components of the course aided my comprehension of the content | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) |
| Disagree | 0 (0%) |
| Neutral | 1 (7.1%) |
| Agree | 6 (42.9%) |
| Strongly agree | 7 (50.0%) |
| Content | |
| Poor | 0 (0%) |
| Fair | 0 (0%) |
| Average | 0 (0%) |
| Good | 6 (42.9%) |
| Excellent | 8 (57.1%) |
| Provided useful research information | |
| Poor | 0 (0%) |
| Fair | 0 (0%) |
| Average | 0 (0%) |
| Good | 3 (21.4%) |
| Excellent | 11 (78.6%) |
| Conveyed the subject matter clearly | |
| Poor | 0 (0%) |
| Fair | 0 (0%) |
| Average | 0 (0%) |
| Good | 3 (21.4%) |
| Excellent | 11 (78.6%) |
| Met learning objectives | |
| Poor | 0 (0%) |
| Fair | 0 (0%) |
| Average | 0 (0%) |
| Good | 4 (28.6%) |
| Excellent | 10 (71.4%) |