You are viewing the site in preview mode
Skip to main content
|
Study
|
Risk ratio
|
95% CI
|
%weight
|
|---|
|
Racine et al., 2011 [28]
|
1.00
|
0.97 to 1.03
|
13.04
|
|
Yamada et al., 2014 [33]
|
1.00
|
0.86 to 1.17
|
2.48
|
|
Andrews et al., 2011 [14]
|
1.06
|
1.00 to 1.11
|
9.60
|
|
Barrera et al., 2006 [22]
|
0.90
|
0.83 to 0.98
|
6.05
|
|
Callisaya et al., 2017 [29]
|
0.96
|
0.80 to 1.15
|
1.94
|
|
Cheskin et al., 2008 [25]
|
2.15
|
1.00 to 4.61
|
0.12
|
|
Clark et al., 2004 [15]
|
1.04
|
0.95 to 1.15
|
4.82
|
|
Glasgow et al., 2000 [30]
|
1.00
|
0.87 to 1.15
|
3.01
|
|
Hesselink et al., 2004 [13]
|
1.18
|
0.99 to 1.42
|
1.90
|
|
Hilbernik et al., 2005 [23]
|
1.01
|
0.97 to 1.05
|
11.33
|
|
John et al., 2012 [34]
|
1.14
|
0.99 to 1.30
|
3.05
|
|
Jonsdottir et al., 2015 [16]
|
0.91
|
0.78 to 1.06
|
2.39
|
|
Khunti et al., 2012 [12]
|
1.08
|
0.99 to 1.18
|
6.02
|
|
Larsen, et al., 2011 [26]
|
0.93
|
0.84 to 1.02
|
4.99
|
|
Lee et al., 2015 [17]
|
1.00
|
0.90 to 1.11
|
4.75
|
|
Meyer et al., 2015 [18]
|
1.16
|
0.82 to 1.63
|
0.58
|
|
Nam et al., 2012 [24]
|
0.81
|
0.69 to 0.95
|
2.25
|
|
Ng et al., 2011 [31]
|
0.79
|
0.57 to 1.10
|
0.63
|
|
Nicolucci et al., 2012 [19]
|
1.00
|
0.95 to 1.05
|
10.08
|
|
Praet et al., 2008 [27]
|
0.95
|
0.66 to 1.36
|
0.53
|
|
Sevick et al., 2012 [32]
|
1.01
|
0.93 to 1.09
|
6.27
|
|
Walters et al., 2013 [20]
|
0.95
|
0.84 to 1.07
|
3.48
|
|
Wilson et al., 2008 [21]
|
0.96
|
0.69 to 1.30
|
0.69
|
|
exp(theta)
|
1.00
|
0.97 to 1.03
| |
